Author Archives: admin

About admin

My husband and I have resided in the Temescal Valley for more than 18 years. We purchased our home "brand new" and chose to live here because we could afford it and because it wasn't the city of Corona. We commuted to our Orange County jobs for 15 years. The commute wasn't all that bad because each day we returned home to our wonderful rural neighborhood. Corona never controlled its growth. Why must we suffer because the city ran out of "developable land." Shame on you Corona. Let the Temescal Valley alone.

A high school for Temescal Valley?

Land sale funds will be used for high school here

(Published Feb. 14, 2018)

The We Are Temescal Valley Education Committee continues to meet regularly with Corona-Norco Unified School District administrators in a joint effort to build a high school in Temescal Valley.

The district had plans to construct a high school here with funds generated by the Measure U bond package, which was passed by district voters in 2006. Originally proposed as Rancho Serrano High School, the plan called for a targeted or “magnet” type school with a focused program in science, technology, engineering, arts and math, with no sports programs. Due to economic conditions at that time and declining growth projections in Temescal Valley, the school never materialized.

Prior to the passage of Measure U, the district in 2004 purchased about 55 acres of land northwest of Lawson and Temescal Canyon roads near Tom’s Farms and the I-15 freeway. The topography and location of the property make it less than ideal for a school – the land is hilly and there is no road access.

The district, working with the Education Committee, now is seeking suitable property within Temescal Valley for a high school and plans to sell the 55 acres. Committee members asked for a guarantee that if the property is sold, the funds will be earmarked for a high school in Temescal Valley.

The CNUSD Board of Education at the Jan. 23 meeting passed a resolution stating, in part:

WHEREAS, the value of the land will be maintained for future educational facilities in or related to educational programs for Temescal Valley; and

WHEREAS, the District’s Board of Education and Superintendent of Schools value and recognize the community concerns expressed by the Temescal Valley Education  Committee regarding the provision of future educational facilities in or related to educational programs in Temescal Valley.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the District’s Board of Education and Superintendent of Schools support providing future resources for the development of educational facilities in or related to educational programs in Temescal Valley.”

High school: Parents don’t want to wait 10 years
for a Temescal Valley  campus

(Published Dec. 11, 2017)

Remember the high school survey launched by the We Are Temescal Valley Education Committee over the summer? Many of you responded – 1,046 to be exact!

The purpose of the survey was to determine the type of high school TV residents living within the Corona-Norco Unified School District (CNUSD), would like to see here. A comprehensive high school with sports programs, which would take $125 million and at least 10 years to build, or a smaller campus with no sports program – a magnet school with curriculum specializing in science, technology, engineering, arts and math (STEAM), which would cost $50 million to $90 million and take four to five years to build?

Most respondents (55 percent), said if money and time were not a factor they preferred the comprehensive high school. Considering the cost and time factor, 62 percent said they favored the STEAM/magnet school over the comprehensive campus. If CNUSD is unable to make progress on building a high school in Temescal Valley, 44 percent said they favored a charter school and another 26 percent said they “maybe” would favor a charter school.

Education Committee member Kelli Noss did an excellent job authoring the survey that was released to CNUSD administrators in October.

See the survey results here:
https://www.wearetv.org/blog/education/hssurvey.pdf

Opinions sought on high school

(Published Aug. 12, 2017)

Hello Neighbors!

The WeAreTV Education Committee continues to meet with Corona-Norco Unified School District administrators and our elected board member, Trustee Bill Pollock, to bring a high school to Temescal Valley.

The committee has created a survey to find out the type of high school the majority of Temescal Valley residents would prefer – a specialized school vs. a standard high school to be built sooner vs. later?

We are asking all Temescal Valley residents to participate in the survey whether you have students in your household or not. We all pay school district taxes and we all care about property values. A high school located here would increase property values and at the same time decrease commute-time traffic on our roadways caused by parents driving students to Corona schools.

Won’t you please take a minute to share your opinion? The survey is short – just three questions and a place to comment if you so desire.

Thank you …
Larissa Adrian, Chairwoman
WeAreTV Education Committee

Toscana Village center approved

COLOR CHANGE: Residents not happy with the use of bright red on some of the buildings asked that the color palette resemble Terramor.

(Published Feb. 13, 2019)

The Board of Supervisors at its Jan. 29 meeting approved the Toscana Village at Temescal Valley shopping center to be constructed at the northwest corner of Indian Truck Trail and Temescal Canyon Road.

Tom Chavez of Speedway Development said grading for the project should begin in the second quarter of this year.

The 27-acre commercial center is to be constructed in two phases and when completed will have a gas station, restaurants, supermarket, and 194,000 square feet of office and retail space. There will be 15 buildings and 1,138 parking spaces.

The center’s 12-acre first phase will have six buildings – including a 16-pump ARCO station with car wash, an am/pm mini-mart, and two fast-food restaurants – one of which is Jack in the Box. Also planned are 4,500- and 6,000-square-foot restaurants, and a 39,000-square-foot, two-story building for offices and retail stores.

Proposed for the 15-acre second phase, to be constructed after completion of the first phase, are nine buildings totaling 133,000 square feet. Planned are two additional restaurants, office and retail space, a supermarket, and possibly a bank and pharmacy.

Planners recommend center’s approval

(Published Jan. 11, 2019)

The county Planning Commission last month voted to recommend to the Board of Supervisors the approval of a retail center planned at the northwest corner of Indian Truck Trail and Temescal Canyon Road.

Toscana Village at Temescal Valley is a proposed 27-acre commercial center to be constructed in two phases and when completed will have a gas station, restaurants, supermarket, and 194,000 square feet of office and retail space. There will be 15 buildings and 1,138 parking spaces.

The public hearing for the center could be on the Board of Supervisors agenda for the Tuesday, Jan. 29 meeting, but a public notice for the hearing has yet to be published.

In voting to approve recommendation of the development, Planning Commission members did impose conditions to the project based on concerns raised by Temescal Valley residents attending the meeting or through emails sent prior to the hearing.

The number of oak trees to be removed along Temescal Canyon Road must be re-evaluated with the possibility that oaks will be included in landscaping plans for the center. A striped bike lane along Temescal Canyon Road is now included in the project and the color scheme for the buildings must be similar to the Terramor housing development.

Concerns over too many traffic signals placed along Temescal Canyon Road proved to be unfounded. Even though the signals  were approved, they will not be placed unless justified by traffic congestion that slows traffic flow.

Residents were told that the issue of possible gridlock on Indian Truck Trail caused by motorists exiting the freeway and making a left turn to access the center would be handled by the county and Caltrans working together to coordinate the synchronization of traffic signals.

The center’s 12-acre first phase will have six buildings – including a 16-pump ARCO station with car wash, an am/pm mini-mart, and two fast-food restaurants – one of which is Jack in the Box. Also planned are 4,500- and 6,000-square-foot restaurants, and a 39,000-square-foot, two-story building for offices and retail stores. Tenants are now being recruited by Speedway Development, the project’s developer.

Some people have concerns that the only tenants announced for the center are the ARCO, am/pm and Jack in the Box. After the meeting, Speedway’s Tom Chavez said that potential tenants do not want to be disclosed until the project is approved.

Proposed for the 15-acre second phase, to be constructed after completion of the first phase, are nine buildings totaling 133,000 square feet. Planned are two additional restaurants, office and retail space, a supermarket, and possibly a bank and pharmacy. All necessary project approvals and the certification of the Environmental Impact Report apply to both phases. Not included in the approvals is the plot plan for the second phase which will need approval prior to construction of that phase.

Questions or comments on the project can be emailed to county planner Russell Bradyrbrady@rivco.org

View the Environmental Impact Report and other documents:
https://planning.rctlma.org/Home/PlanningNotices/EIRforToscanaVillage.aspx

Public hearing set for shopping center

(Published Dec. 14, 2018)
A retail center planned at the northwest corner of Indian Truck Trail and Temescal Canyon Road has completed the planning process and is scheduled for a public hearing before the county’s Planning Commission at 9 a.m., Wednesday, Dec. 19.

COMMERCIAL CENTER: The 27 acres at the northwest corner of Indian Truck Trail and Temescal Canyon Road, outlined above in red, are the subject of a Dec. 19 Planning Commission public hearing. Speedway Development is seeking approval of the project at the meeting.

Toscana Village at Temescal Valley is a proposed 27-acre commercial-retail center to be constructed in two phases and when completed will have a gas station, restaurants, supermarket, and 194,000 square feet of office and retail space. There will be 15 buildings and 1,138 parking spaces.

The 12-acre first phase will have six buildings – including a 16-pump ARCO station with car wash, an am/pm mini-mart, and two fast-food restaurants – one of which is a Jack in the Box. Also planned are 4,500- and 6,000-square-foot restaurants, and a 39,000-square-foot, two-story building for offices and retail stores. Tenants are now being recruited by Speedway Development, the project’s developer.

Proposed for the 15-acre second phase, to be constructed after completion of the first phase, are nine buildings totaling 133,000 square feet. Planned are two additional restaurants, office and retail space, a supermarket, and possibly a bank and pharmacy.

Public comments to the draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR), released in July have been included in the final EIR. Noted were concerns about the number of oak trees to be removed, the undergrounding of power lines, center signage and the lack of bike lanes planned for the project.

Several commenters opposed the addition of three traffic signals along Temescal Canyon Road between the entrance to Terramor and the signalized intersection at Indian Truck Trail. Residents stated the signals would cause congestion by slowing the flow of traffic, including the large aggregate haulers which use this route to access the freeway heading southbound from the mines.

One commenter questioned the validity of the traffic studies, stating the service station and fast-food restaurants would attract many freeway motorists. He noted that the short expanse of Indian Truck Trail, between the northbound freeway on- and off- ramps and Temescal Canyon Road, would be gridlocked by motorists making a left turn to access the center.

The 14 comments submitted and the county’s response can be viewed at:
https://planning.rctlma.org/Home/PlanningNotices/EIRforToscanaVillage.aspx

Since the Dec. 6 public release of the final EIR, the We Are Temescal Valley Development Committee has compiled a list of concerns members feel have not been adequately addressed.
https://www.wearetv.org/blog/docs/toscana.pdf

The Planning Commission’s 9 a.m., Wednesday, Dec. 19 hearing is at the county Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon St., Riverside. If you cannot attend the meeting, comments about the project can be emailed no later than Tuesday, Dec. 18 to county planner Russell Bradyrbrady@rivco.org

DEIR released for proposed retail center

(Published July, 13, 2017)
A retail center planned at the northwest corner of Indian Truck Trail and Temescal Canyon Road has completed the planning process and is scheduled for a public hearing before the county’s Planning Commission at 9 a.m., Wednesday, Dec. 19.

Toscana Village at Temescal Valley is a proposed 27-acre commercial-retail center to be constructed in two phases and when completed will have a gas station, restaurants, supermarket, and 194,000 square feet of office and retail space. There will be 15 buildings and 1,138 parking spaces.

The 12-acre first phase will have six buildings – including a 16-pump ARCO station with car wash, an am/pm mini-mart, and two fast-food restaurants – one of which is a Jack in the Box. Also planned are 4,500- and 6,000-square-foot restaurants, and a 39,000-square-foot, two-story building for offices and retail stores. Tenants are now being recruited by Speedway Development, the project’s developer.

Proposed for the 15-acre second phase, to be constructed after completion of the first phase, are nine buildings totaling 133,000 square feet. Planned are two additional restaurants, office and retail space, a supermarket, and possibly a bank and pharmacy.

Public comments to the draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR), released in July have been included in the final EIR. Noted were concerns about the number of oak trees to be removed, the undergrounding of power lines, center signage and the lack of bike lanes planned for the project.

Several commenters opposed the addition of three traffic signals along Temescal Canyon Road between the entrance to Terramor and the signalized intersection at Indian Truck Trail. Residents stated the signals would cause congestion by slowing the flow of traffic, including the large aggregate haulers which use this route to access the freeway heading southbound from the mines.

One commenter questioned the validity of the traffic studies, stating the service station and fast-food restaurants would attractA retail center planned at the northwest corner of Indian Truck Trail and Temescal Canyon Road is a step closer to reality with the completion of the development’s Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR).

Toscana Village at Temescal Valley is a proposed 27-acre commercial-retail center to be constructed in two phases and when completed will have a gas station, restaurants, supermarket, and 194,000 square feet of office and retail space. There will be 15 buildings and 1,138 parking spaces.

The 12-acre first phase will have six buildings – including an ARCO station with car wash, an am/pm mini-mart and two fast-food restaurants. Also planned are 4,500- and 6,000-square-foot restaurants, and a 39,000-square-foot, two-story building for offices and retail stores. Tenants are now being recruited by Speedway Development, the project’s developer.

Proposed for the 15-acre second phase, to be constructed after completion of the first phase, are nine buildings totaling 133,000 square feet. Planned are two additional restaurants, office and retail space, a supermarket, and possibly a bank and pharmacy.

The DEIR took 10 months to complete following an initial study and scoping meeting held last August to receive public comment. Environmental issues addressed in the report include the “potentially significant” areas of Air Quality, Cultural Resources, Land Use Planning, Transportation/Traffic, Biological Resources, Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Noise.

The DEIR can be viewed at:
http://planning.rctlma.org/Home/PlanningNotices/EIRforToscanaVillage.aspx

Public comments on the DEIR are now being accepted until Monday, July 9 and can be emailed to county planner Russell Brady, rbrady@rivco.org

After all comments are reviewed and evaluated, the project will be processed for a public hearing before the county Planning Commission.

Aug. 2 deadline for comments on retail center

(Published July, 13, 2017)
The county has scheduled a scoping meeting on Monday, July 24 in preparation for an Environmental Impact Report for the commercial center planned at the northwest corner of Indian Truck Trail and Temescal Canyon Road.

The 1:30 p.m. meeting will be held at the county’s Riverside Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon St., 1st floor, Conference Room 2A.

Toscana Village at Temescal Valley is a proposed 27-acre commercial-retail center to be constructed in two phases and when completed will have a gas station, restaurants, supermarket, and office and retail space totaling 194,000 square feet. There will be 21 buildings and 1,138 parking spaces.

The 12-acre first phase will have six buildings – including an ARCO station with carwash, an am/pm mini-mart and a Jack in the Box. Another fast-food restaurant is planned, plus 4,500- and 6,000-square-foot restaurants, and a 39,000-square-foot, two-story building for offices and retail stores. Tenants for these businesses are now being recruited by Speedway Development, the project’s developer.

An environmental assessment for the property has been completed and a draft Environmental Impact Report will be created from that initial study, as well as agency and community input heard at the scoping meeting.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________

The Notice of Preparation and Initial Study can be viewed at:
http://planning.rctlma.org/Home/NOPforToscanaVillage.aspx

DEADLINE FOR COMMENTS IS WEDNESDAY, AUG. 2
Comments should be emailed to Russell Brady, rbrady@rivco.org
_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Following a presentation at the meeting, the public can get questions answered and voice comments about environmental concerns they may have with the project. The draft EIR only will address areas that the initial study has found to be “potentially significant.” These are: Air Quality, Cultural Resources, Land Use Planning, Transportation/Traffic, Biological Resources, Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Noise.

Comments are now being accepted on the project and can be emailed to County Planner Russell Brady, rbrady@rivco.org. Deadline for comments is Wednesday, Aug. 2.

Once the draft EIR is prepared, including proposed mitigations to lessen/eliminate the impacts, the public again will have the opportunity to comment on the project.

ARCO ampm first tenant for center

(Published Jan. 20, 2017)

SERVICE STATION/CONVENIENCE STORE: An artist's rendering of the ARCO ampm proposed for construction at the northwest corner of Indian Truck Trail and Temescal Canyon Road.

SERVICE STATION/CONVENIENCE STORE: An artist’s rendering of the ARCO ampm proposed for construction at the northwest corner of Indian Truck Trail and Temescal Canyon Road.

People attending the January Temescal Valley Municipal Advisory Council meeting received an update on the 27-acre shopping center planned for the northwest corner of Indian Truck Trail and Temescal Canyon Road.

Tom Chavez and Winnie Wong, representing Speedway Development, said they would be resubmitting development plans for county approval in a week or two and hoped to begin construction in the fall.

The center will be constructed in phases with an ARCO ampm and fast-food restaurants planned for the first phase. Chavez said they would soon announce who the fast-food tenants will be.

More information on the development can be found scrolling down this page and the developer has created a Facebook page for updates: Speedway Development (www.facebook.com/Speedway-Development-1593218220970707/)

TOSCANA VILLAGE AT TEMESCAL VALLEY PHASE 1 (Click on image for a larger view).

TOSCANA VILLAGE AT TEMESCAL VALLEY PHASE 1 (Click on image for a larger view).

TOSCANA VILLAGE AT TEMESCAL VALLEY PHASE 2 (Click on photo for a larger view).

TOSCANA VILLAGE AT TEMESCAL VALLEY PHASE 2 (Click on photo for a larger view).

Plans for retail center announced

(Published Oct. 12, 2014)

Michael Bastian of Henry-Ann Company, representing Speedway Development at the Oct. 8 Municipal Advisory Council, provided more details on a proposed commercial/retail center to be built on Temescal Canyon Road across the street from the 1,443-home Toscana community.

Bastian said the 27-acre parcel will be built in three phases. The first three-acre phase, at Indian Truck Trail’s northound on-ramp to the I-15, calls for a service station/convenience store and two fast-food restaurants. He said discussions have begun with possible tenants, but he was not a liberty to name the businesses.

The second phase of about 12 acres will be commercial/retail businesses with the possibility of fine-dining restaurants. The final phase will be light industrial — maybe used for office space.

Each phase will  be constructed as tenants sign on to keep buildings from standing vacant.

Bastian also said the earlier color scheme of the buildings in shades of green and gold have been changed to match the Tuscan theme of the Toscana project — earth tones and red-tiled roofs. The name of the center has been changed from Temescal Valley Gateway to Toscana Village at Temescal Valley.

Bastain said signage identifying the tenants will be visible from the freeway, but will be more attractive than the signs at Dos Lagos and The Crossings.

He said the center’s layout presented a challenge with all the entrances facing the freeway, leaving the rear of the buildings to face Temescal Canyon Road. He said project designers are taking that into consideration and the back of the buildings will be aesthetically pleasing.

No dates for groundbreaking could be given as the project still must be approved by the county, but Bastian said the process is moving quickly.

Corona council OKs 31 more acres for Arantine Hills

EXPANSION PLAN: The area outlined in red illustrates the 159-acre parcel that The New Home Company seeks to subdivide to add 31 acres to the already approved 276-acre Arantine Hills housing development. The developer is purchasing the 31 acres from the McMillan Trust. Plans by the developer and McMillian for the remaining 127 acres are unknown.

(Published Jan. 11. 2019)

The newly seated Corona City Council last month gave the go-ahead to The New Home Company to add 31 acres to its 276-acre housing development while adding no additional homes.

The number of residential units remains at 1,621 as specified in the original approval. That approval also includes the ability to construct an additional 185 units if designated “age-restricted” (55 and older), which would allow 1,806 homes to be built.

With the approval of the additional acreage, the City Council changed the definition of age-restricted to 62 and older, reasoning that if senior-housing is built, an age closer to retirement could reduce the number of daily car trips.

The 31 acres TNHC will add are located between the Eagle Glen Golf Club and the project’s southern boundary. The property is part of a 159-acre parcel, now zoned agriculture. Approval was given for a zone change to medium density residential and open space on the 31 acres. The agriculture zoning on the parcel’s remaining 127 acres will not change.

That acreage contains two plateaus that back up to The Retreat neighborhood in Temescal Valley. Fred Myers, a resident of The Retreat, and other Temescal Valley residents attending the meeting were told any plans to develop the remaining 127 acres would require an environmental impact report and an amendment to the Arantine Hills Specific Plan, as well as other approvals.

Councilman Wes Speake asked that focus not be lost on creating a viable trail system that would have a future connection point to both the Cleveland National Forest and Temescal Creek, and that a trailhead available to the public be established within the development.

Corona council to review Arantine Hills land expansion

(Published Dec. 14, 2018)
As suggested by the Corona Planning Commission, the developer of Arantine Hills modified the project’s zoning densities, and a request to increase the development’s acreage was approved at the Nov. 26 commission meeting.

The New Home Company (TNHC), is seeking city approval to amend the project’s already-amended specific plan by adding 31.18 acres to the approved 276-acre housing development.

Although TNHC wants to expand the development’s acreage, the number of residential units would remain at 1,621 as specified in the original approval. That approval also includes the construction of an additional 185 units if designated “age-restricted” (55 and older), which could bring the total number of homes to 1,806.

With the added acreage, TNHC also wants to redistribute the location of homes within the development’s approved planning areas and to increase the open space zoning from 56.8 acres to 77.4 acres.

But the Planning Commission, at an Oct. 22 public hearing, balked at TNHC’s plans to change the zoning densities within the planning areas. TNHC was asked to “re-think” the densities and present a new plan at a future commission meeting.

Currently, 387 units are zoned low density (3 to 6 dwelling units per acre). New Home wanted 234 LDR units, but at the Nov. 26 meeting changed that to 365 units. TNHC asked that medium density zoning (6 to 15 units per acre), be increased from 720 to 820 units, but now will settle for 725 units. High density zoning (15 to 36 units per acre), currently at 514 units would have increased to 567. TNHC changed the number to 531 units.

The medium density zoning for the planning area that is adjacent to Temescal Valley’s Weirick Road neighborhood surprisingly was reduced from 167 units to 147.

The 31 acres TNHC seeks to add to the development are located between the Eagle Glen Golf Club and the project’s southern boundary. The property is part of a 159.16-acre parcel, now zoned agriculture and owned by the McMillan Trust. TNHC is purchasing the 31 acres and is asking the city to change the zoning to medium density residential and open space. The agriculture zoning on the parcel’s remaining 127.35 would not change.

That acreage contains two plateaus that border closely on The Retreat neighborhood in the Temescal Valley. While John Sherwood, TNHC’s vice president of community development, has said the company has no plans to develop the plateaus, Fred Myers, a resident of The Retreat, isn’t so sure.

Myers produced escrow documentation at the Nov. 26 meeting showing that McMillan was selling land to TNHC. Sherwood countered that the documentation referred to an easement that was required because by purchasing the 31 acres, TNHC couldn’t leave the plateaus landlocked.

The next step in the approval process is a public hearing now scheduled for the Wednesday, Dec. 19, 6:30 p.m. City Council meeting to be held at Corona City Hall, 400 S. Vicentia Ave.

Planners to revisit developer’s request on Nov. 26

(Published Nov. 21, 2018)
Temescal Valley residents are intently watching planning and zoning changes that could be made to the new Arantine Hills (Bedford), community now being constructed on the valley’s northern boundary.

The Corona Planning & Housing Commission on Nov. 26 will again consider a request by The New Home Company (TNHC), to amend the project’s already-amended specific plan by adding 31.18 acres to the approved 276-acre housing development.

Although TNHC wants to expand the development’s acreage, the number of residential units would remain at 1,621 as specified in the original approval. That approval also includes the construction of an additional 185 units if designated “age-restricted” (55 and older), which could bring the total number of homes to 1,806.

According to TNHC, the land expansion is necessary because a 9.5-acre planning area within the project approved for 130 homes had to be converted to a water basin.

With the request to add 31 more acres, TNHC also is seeking approval to redistribute the location of homes within the development’s approved planning areas and to increase the open space zoning from 56.8 acres to 77.4 acres.

ZONING DENSITY CHANGES

With the redistribution of homes, the developer also wants to redefine the zoning density within the planning areas.

Currently, 387 units are zoned low density (3 to 6 dwelling units per acre). New Home now wants 234 LDR units, a 40 percent decrease. Medium density zoning (6 to 15 units per acre), would change from 720 to 820 units, an increase of 14 percent. High density zoning (15 to 36 units per acre), currently at 514 units would increase to 567, up 10 percent.

The 31 acres TNHC wants to add to the development are located between the Eagle Glen Golf Club and the project’s southern boundary. The acreage is part of a 159.16-acre parcel, now zoned agriculture and owned by the McMillan Trust. TNHC is purchasing the 31 acres and is asking the city to change the zoning to medium density residential and open space. The agriculture zoning on the parcel’s remaining 127.35 would not change.

It’s the unknown plans for those 127 acres that have raised concerns for Temescal Valley residents.

That acreage contains two plateaus that border closely on The Retreat neighborhood. Past consensus on that parcel has been that the height of the plateaus would make it impossible to build the necessary infrastructure to allow for development. But mention of the plateaus in the request to amend the specific plan could be an indication of things to come, according to Fred Myers a resident of The Retreat.

That’s why Myers and six other Temescal Valley residents attended the Planning Commission’s Oct. 22 meeting when the TNHC’s request for changes first appeared on the agenda.

Following lengthy discussion and comments from the public, commissioners continued the item to the Nov. 13 meeting, instructing TNHC to rethink the zoning density changes it is seeking.

Commissioner Jeff Ruscigno questioned the decrease in low density zoning for planning areas adjacent to the Eagle Glen neighborhood and noted the importance of keeping the zoning consistent as TNHC stated it would when the amended specific plan was approved.

PLATEAUS WOULD BE CONSIDERED

When asked after the meeting by a Temescal Valley resident if the developer would pursue plans to develop the remaining acreage containing the plateaus, John Sherwood, TNHC’s vice president of community development, said “We have not been approached by McMillian to purchase the remaining acreage.” When questioned further, Sherwood said if approached by McMillan, they would consider developing the plateaus.

Temescal Valley residents are concerned because when the amended specific plan was approved in 2016, several valley residents asked that only low-density development be allowed in a 29.9-acre planning area directly adjacent to the Weirick Road Neighborhood. The request was ignored, and the city approved 167 medium-density homes to be built next to Weirick’s rural estate zoning that allows only one home per 5-acre parcel.

TNHC, prior to the Nov. 13 meeting, requested that the item be continued to the Monday, Nov. 26 agenda. The meeting begins at 6 p.m. and will be held in the Corona City Hall council chambers, 400 S. Vicentia Ave.

Contract for Cajalco bridge awarded

(Published June 30, 2017)
Without much fanfare or discussion, the Corona City Council at a June 28 study session awarded a contract for improvements to the Cajalco Road interchange. The winning bid of $44.6 million was submitted by Riverside Construction Inc

The bridge will be widened from two to six lanes, a sidewalk is proposed along the south of Cajalco and a bike lane is proposed on both sides of the roadway. Public Works director Nelson Nelson told council members that work should begin in September/October and be completed by September 2019.

With the awarding of the contract for the improvement project, a lawsuit seeking a writ of mandate against the City of Corona and the New Home Co. has been dismissed.

While inactivity has been noted on the 1,800-home development being built west of the I-15, south of Cajalco Road and adjacent to Temescal Valley’s northern boundary, construction soon should begin on the property. The New Home Co. has recently advertised for bids for a traffic signal, and sewer, water and reclaimed water improvements.

Months ago the New Home Co. changed the name of the controversial development from Arantine Hills to Bedford South Corona. Here’s their new website: http://www.livebedford.com/

Court ruling due in Arantine Hills suit

(Published May 26, 2017)
Superior Court Judge Craig G. Reimer on April 27 heard attorneys’ arguments in the Arantine Hills writ of mandate suit filed by Citizens for Responsible, Economical and Environmental Development (CREED-21), against the city of Corona and developer New Home Company.

The judge had issued a partial tentative ruling favoring the city and developer prior to the April 27 hearing.

After hearing the arguments, Reimer indicated he’d issue a final decision by the end of May, according to Anthony Kim, an attorney with Briggs Law Corp. representing CREED-21.

If granted, the writ of mandate would not stop the project, but could force the city to correct what CREED-21 says were improper actions taken in the approval of the 1,800-home development.

CREED-21 alleges the city should have had a new environmental impact report for the project instead of a supplemental EIR, and that the necessary infrastructure should be in place before the homes are constructed. 

READ THE COURT REPORTER TRANSCRIPT OF THE APRIL 27 HEARING

(Published April 17, 2017)
The Arantine Hills hearing set for Tuesday, April 18 in Department 5 of the Superior Court in Riverside has been taken off the calendar.

Information sought by the court was to be submitted in both hard-copy and digital format. The record of material in this case was either submitted in an erroneous manner or too late for review prior to the hearing date.

When both sides agree that all documentation is acceptable, a new hearing date will be set.

(Published March 29, 2017)
The March 30 court date has been continued, according to Anthony N. Kim, an attorney with Briggs Law Corporation representing the plaintiffs in the lawsuit filed against the city of Corona and the Arantine Hills developers. The new date could be Tuesday, April 18, but as of now there is no official confirmation of that date.

(Published March 26, 2017)
A suit seeking a writ of mandate filed against the city of Corona and the developer of the Arantine Hills housing project will be heard by Judge Craig G. Reimer at 1:30 p.m., Thursday, March 30 in Dept. 05 of the Riverside County Superior Court, 4050 Main St., in downtown Riverside.

Citizens for Responsible, Economical and Environmental Development, a San Diego-based non-profit corporation known as CREED-21, in October filed suit against the city and New Home Company regarding the Arantine Hills project. www.wearetv.org/blog/arantine/lawsuit.pdf

The Corona City Council approved the 1,806-home development last May and grading has begun on the property located south of Eagle Glen and north of Temescal Valley’s Weirick Road neighborhood. The development agreement between the city and New Home Company allows homes to be built prior to improvements being made to the Cajalco interchange.

In seeking the writ of mandate, CREED-21 maintains that because the developer was requesting changes to the project’s original approval in July 2012, a new environmental impact report should have been prepared. Instead, the city allowed adjustments to be made to the original EIR, creating a supplemental EIR which was used in last year’s project approval.

CREED-21 states in the suit, “It is important to note that Petitioner is not anti-development and is not trying to shut this project down. Instead, Petitioner wants the City’s officials to fulfill their duty to be transparent about the true impacts of the project and to ensure that the necessary infrastructure is in place before the project moves forward.”

The city responded to the suit’s allegations in a brief filed in early December (www.wearetv.org/blog/arantine/city_brief.pdf), and CREED-21 responded to the city in a brief filed later in the month (www.wearetv.org/blog/arantine/reply_brief.pdf).

Two declarants are listed in the suit, Richard Lawrence who states he is president of CREED-21 and Mercedita Valdez who states she is a CREED-21 member and a Corona homeowner.

1,806 HOMES: This is the development plan for Arantine Hills. The property currently is being graded.

Corona City Council OKs Arantine Hills

(Published May 23, 2016)
The Corona City Council at its May 19 meeting approved the 1,800-home Arantine Hills project. The development agreement between the city and developer New Home Company allows homes to be built prior to improvements made to the Cajalco interchange. Grading for the housing project is expected to start immediately.

The first 308 homes could be ready for sale mid-2017 — the same time improvements to the bridge are expected to begin. The development agreement also allows the possibility of 1,300 homes being constructed before the interchange project is half finished.

MORE INFORMATION
View the meeting HERE

Related Press-Enterprise report:
Vote paves way for nearly 2,000-home Arantine Hills project

City Council to vote on Arantine Hills

(Published May 4, 2016)
The fate of the 1,800-home Arantine Hills project should be determined at a Corona City Council public hearing, 6:30 p.m., Thursday, May 19 at City Hall, 400 S. Vicentia Ave.

The public can comment on the project at the meeting, with statements not to exceed three minutes. Comments also can be emailed to City Clerk Lisa Mobley at lisa.mobley@ci.corona.ca.us  and must be received no later than Tuesday, May 17.

MORE INFORMATION
Public Hearing Notice

Commission says ‘yes’ to Arantine Hills

(Published April 26, 2016)
The Corona Planning Commission gave thumbs up to the 1,800-home Arantine Hills Development following a public hearing on April 25, and will recommend the project’s approval to the City Council.

Nineteen people spoke at the hearing — five people were in favor of the project and the remaining speakers opposed it.

Most of the opposition — primarily Temescal Valley and Eagle Glen residents, was against the plan’s proposal to allow 308 homes to be built before construction begins on improvements to the Cajalco interchange.

The Development Agreement between the city and New Home Company, the developer, outlined how building permits/certificates of occupancy will be issued. After the first 308 homes are built and bridge improvements begin, 600 more permits will be issued, 390 more permits will be issued when the bridge is 50 percent complete and the rest of the permits issued when the bridge construction is 95 percent complete.

Construction should start on the interchange in July 2017 and will take two years to complete.

Riverside County Transportation Department sent Patty Romo to address county concerns, primarily that traffic studies had under-estimated the number of vehicles that would be using Temescal Canyon Road and that funding should be made available for improvements to TCR.

Speakers for the project represented the Building Industry Association, The Crossings, The Shops at Dos Lagos and the Corona Chamber of Commerce, which favored homes and less commercial/retail.

City staff, in presenting the project to the planning commissioners, recommended approval based on the offer by the developer to pay not only its share for the bridge improvements, but to front the entire amount, including the city’s two-thirds share of the estimated $67 million costs.

Staff reasoned that the offer by the developer would enable the improvements to be made sooner, rather than later, because the city does not have the funding to make the improvements.

Staff also said by reducing the amount of commercial acreage from 38 to 10 acres, estimated daily trips would be reduced by 11,000. Staff said this reduction in daily trips would allow 308 homes to be built without impacting traffic.

Eleven people from Temescal Valley attended the hearing. Seven offered comments and voiced concerns about the proximity of the development to the valley’s Weirick Road neighborhood, where zoning allows only one home per five acres.

All opposing arguments addressed gridlock on the I-15 and surface streets, and some questioned the timing of the project with the 1-15 toll lanes construction set to begin in 2018. The resounding message voiced by the opponents was to “Build the bridge first.”

The Corona City Council will vote on the project following another public hearing, possibly scheduled at its Thursday, May 19 meeting.

MORE INFORMATION
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
Video of Planing Commission Public Hearing

Related Press-Enterprise report:
Arantine Hills gets nod from Planning Commission

Arantine Hills hearing is April 25

(Published April 13, 2016)
A Planning Commission public hearing for the Arantine Hills development will be held at 6 p.m., Monday, April 25 at Corona City Hall, 400 S. Vicentia Ave. People who have opinions either for or against the changes and can’t make the April 25 hearing can email their comments prior to April 21 to city planner Terri Manuel at terrim@ci.corona.ca.us

The project is located west of the I-15 in the Bedford Wash between Eagle Glen and the northern boundary of Temescal Valley. The 1,806-home development was approved by the city in July 2012. New Home Company, which purchased the development from Bluestone Communities after the city’s approval, is asking for changes to what was originally approved, creating the need to amend the specific plan and modify the environmental impact report.

The amended specific plan and modified environmental impact report, as well as documents outlining the project’s 2012 approval can be found at http://discovercorona.com/City-Departments/Community-Development/Planning-Division/Arantine-Hills-Project.aspx After hearing comments from the public and city staff at the April 25 hearing, planning commissioners are expected to vote on the project as a recommendation to the City Council whether to approve or deny the changes. The City Council, at a future public hearing, will make the ultimate decision on changes to the project.

Comments sought on changes to Arantine Hills documents

(Published Feb. 13, 2016)
The city of Corona is accepting comments on the Arantine Hills amended specific plan and draft supplemental environmental impact report. The deadline to submit comments is Monday, Feb. 22.

The project is located west of the I-15 in the Bedford Wash between Eagle Glen and the northern boundary of Temescal Valley. The 1,806-home development was approved by the city in July 2012.

New Home Company, which purchased the development after the city’s approval, is asking for changes to what was originally approved, creating the need to amend the specific plan and modify the environmental impact report.

Notable changes include a reduction in general commercial acreage from 38 to 10 acres, increasing open space from 36.6 to 56.8 acres, reducing parkland from 15.2 to 8.7 acres and deleting from the plan a recreational trail and bikeway that would have been available for public use outside the gated community.

Additionally, the developer wants to construct 308 homes before construction starts on improvements to the Cajalco interchange, and once bridge construction begins, homes could continue to be built. The 2012 approval was conditioned on bridge improvements being completed prior to building permits being issued.

Total cost of the bridge improvement is about $62 million with New Home Company being responsible for one-third. If allowed to build homes prior to the improvements, New Home Company will advance the entire amount including the city’s share. While New Home Company can pay its share of about $21 million, the city says it has no funds available to pay for the remaining $41 million.

A development agreement between the city and New Home Company will outline how the city will repay the advanced funds for the improvement. City staff, in May, told the City Council the bridge was over capacity now, and the costs to make improvements would only increase the longer it takes to correct the problem. Staff also told the council no money in paybacks would come from the city’s general fund.

Temescal Valley residents, as well as Corona residents living in Eagle Glen, are citing concerns about school overcrowding and additional gridlock to the I-15 caused by homes being built prior to interchange improvements being made. Additional concerns are keeping open the access to the Bedford Wash hiking trails and the proximity of proposed medium density homes to the estate-zoned parcels (one home per five acres), in the Weirick Road neighborhood.

People are questioning why New Home Company would purchase the approved project knowing the conditions of the approval and the stipulation that no homes could be built prior to interchange improvements being completed.

Comments should be emailed prior to Feb. 22 to city planner Terri Manuel at terrim@ci.corona.ca.us. The dates for public hearings have yet to be determined.

MORE INFORMATION
Amended Specific Plan & Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report
Project Fact Sheet
About the project

Related Press-Enterprise reports:
June 19, 2015: Developer revises Arantine Hills plan
Jan. 9, 2015: Huge proposed housing project faces obstacles
Aug. 6, 2014: Corona housing develpment back on the drawing board

Arantine Hills back on drawing board

(Published June 14, 2015)
The city of Corona held two meetings in May with New Home Company, the developer who wants to make changes to the plans for Arantine Hills, the 1,600-plus home development approved by the city in July 2012. The project is located west of the I-15 in the Bedford Wash between Cajalco Road and the northern boundary of Temescal Valley.

New Home company, which purchased the development after the city’s approval, is asking for considerably less commercial retail acreage and wants to start building the homes at the same time construction begins on improvements to the Cajalco interchange. The 2012 approval was conditioned on bridge improvements being completed prior to homes being built.

During the May meetings, New Home Company told City Council members they are willing to build a smaller retail center — 80,000 square feet, outside the community’s gates at Eagle Glen Parkway and Bedford Canyon Road. New Home said there would be no family apartments, but when questioned further, said there could be senior apartments which could bring the housing total up to 1,800-plus.

In the original agreement, the developer was responsible for funding one-third of the costs for the bridge improvement — the total cost today being about $62 million. New Home now has offered to advance the entire $62 million if the city will allow construction on the bridge and the homes to begin simultaneously. While New Home can pay its share of about $21 million, city staff said there were no funds available to pay for the remaining $41 million.

If the city accepts the offer, a development agreement between the city and New Home Company will outline how the advanced fees will be repaid. City staff said the bridge was over capacity now, and the costs to make improvements would only increase the longer it takes to correct the problem. Staff also told the council no money in paybacks would come from the city’s general fund.

Temescal Valley residents speaking at both meetings cited concerns about school overcrowding, gridlock, keeping access to the Bedford Wash hiking trails open and the proximity of proposed homes to the estate-zoned parcels (one home per five acres), in the Weirick Road neighborhood.

A Weirick Road resident, whose home would be adjacent to proposed homes in the project, said he owns many horses and doesn’t want complaints about noise, odors and flies from Arantine Hills residents.

The city made it clear to the developer that it must meet with area residents to discuss their concerns. An open meeting has been scheduled 6 to 8 p.m., Monday June 15 at the Eagle Glen Golf Club’s Monument Room, 1800 Eagle Glen Parkway. LEARN MORE ABOUT THE PROJECT

Golf course owner buys Tom’s Farms

IT’S OFFICIAL: Sunny Hwang, owner of the Glen Ivy Golf Club, closed escrow on Tom’s Farms on June 9.

New owner plans to improve the attraction

Tom’s Farms has been purchased by Sunny Hwang, owner of the Glen Ivy Golf Club. The purchase price has not been disclosed for the 46-acre tourist attraction that includes 16 buildings and structures, and two adjacent undeveloped parcels.

Hwang intends to continue the legacy of Tom Barnes, who started the business 46 years ago, and will maintain Tom’s Farms as a retail and amusement attraction. “I plan to update the property to make it more enjoyable for families,” Hwang said.

Among the attractions Hwang said he is considering is the possibility of a small-scale farm with barnyard animals and a vegetable garden. He said the addition of more shops is possible, as well as changes for the restaurants. “I definitely want to add more shade,” Hwang said, “to improve the shopping experience and to provide areas where families can just relax and enjoy the surroundings.

Hwang said he wanted to get through escrow, which closed June 9, before laying out timelines for specific projects.

He also noted that a hotel might be considered for one of the two parcels located at the southwest corner of Temescal Canyon and Lawson roads, and at the southeast corner of Temescal Canyon and Squaw Mountain roads. “Whatever is developed on the parcels should be compatible with the golf course and Tom’s Farms,” Hwang said.

Barnes, a much-respected and admired businessman, died of cancer in July 2001 at the age of 55. A decision was made in January of this year to sell the property, and it was listed with Braun International Real Estate which published a 20-page “call for offers” sales memorandum.

While the Cheese & Wine Shoppe building was included in the purchase, the business was not. The building is leased and the business is owned by Frank Hetland Sr. and sons Frank Jr. and Brandon. Barnes and Hetland were close friends for many years and the Cheese & Wine Shoppe was one of the early businesses at the Farm.

Hwang, who owns and is president of Sunland Properties Inc., surprised many people in March 2016 when a U.S. District Court judge deemed his $4.3 million offer the winning bid to purchase Glen Ivy Golf Club. Also submitting a bid was GOCO Hospitality, a Bangkok-based international wellness hospitality development and management company, which purchased the Glen Ivy Hot Springs spa in January 2016.

The golf course, adjacent to Trilogy, had been in receivership since March 2014 when the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission charged then-owner World Capital Market Inc. of operating a worldwide pyramid scheme and seized the company’s assets.

Hwang, 68, said he finds the natural beauty and mountain topography of Temescal Valley impressive, and views it regularly. Although Sunland Properties is headquartered in Rancho Cucamonga, he hasn’t been an absentee business owner. While making improvements to the golf course, he’s also an avid golfer, and is often seen on the links trying to improve his game.

SEE RELATED STORY: Tom’s Farms could be sold

2017 FAIRE PHOTO CONTEST WINNERS

Landscape First Place: “Morning Trail” by Mark Tanner

Landscape Second Place: “Serenity” by Laura Cortez

Landscape Third Place: “Old Tree at Sunset” by Jim Appleby

Animals First Place: “Water Wars” by Rob Mucha

Animals Second Place: “Just Emerged” by Chris Iseri

Animals Third Place: “Are You My Mother? Lucy and Orphan Ducks” by Laura Jannuzzi

Things To Do First Place: “Hiking With Friends” by Mackenzie Hoag

Things To Do Second Place: “Step by Step” by Tracy Hoag

Things To Do Third Place: “Zipping at Skull Canyon” by Kristha Cortes

Best of Show: “Sunrise in Trilogy” by Chris Iseri

2017 MONTHLY PHOTO CONTEST WINNERS

MARCH WINNERS

FIRST PLACE: Sunrise in Trilogy – CHRIS McCRACKEN ISERI, Trilogy

SECOND PLACE: The Sky is Lava – CONNOR DeCOCQ, Horsethief Canyon Ranch

THIRD PLACE: Dawson Creek – LAURA JANNUZZI, Horsethief Canyon Ranch

FEBRUARY WINNERS

FIRST PLACE: The Road Less Traveled – JIM APPLEBY SR, Horsethief Canyon Ranch

SECOND PLACE: Blue Heron – JUDY NUTTALL DYER, Trilogy

THIRD PLACE: Never Give Up –  DENISE HATFIELD, Horsethief Canyon Ranch

JANUARY WINNERS

FIRST PLACE: Tom’s Farms Field – MATTHEW HOAG, Horsethief Canyon Ranch

SECOND PLACE: Morning Reflections – BRENDA NICASSIO, Sycamore Creek

THIRD PLACE: Old Tree 01 – JIM APPLEBY SR, Horsethief Canyon Ranch

Industrial building to be built on Knabe

140,000-SQUARE-FOOT BUILDING: The county has given the go-ahead to owner/developer CapRock Partners to construct an industrial building on Knabe Road similar to this artist’s rendering.

An almost 140,000-square-foot industrial building is soon to be built on the northwest corner of Knabe Road and Bedford Motorway. The project was approved earlier this month at a Riverside County Planning Director’s hearing.

Because the zoning classification of the property is Industrial Park, owner/developer CapRock Partners was not seeking a zone change, only approval of what it plans to build.

The county in 2004 approved seven industrial buildings and a self-storage facility at the same location, but the recession halted the project. About three years ago, 184 apartments were proposed for the site, but the project was withdrawn when the We Are Temescal Valley Development Committee objected to the proposal. The committee also opposed a later proposal to put condominiums on the 9.21-acre site.

Although the building’s future tenant is unknown at this time, CapRock estimates the development will create from 50 to 90 jobs and reduce the number of daily truck trips by 24 percent as compared to the project that was approved 13 years ago.

Trucks only will enter and exit the project by a driveway from Knabe Road to be built at the north end of the property. Employees will use Bedford Motorway. Restriping is planned for Knabe Road to facilitate this project, as well as the Riverside Medical Clinic project proposed for the southwest corner of Knabe Road and Retreat Parkway.

The 42- to 46-foot tall building, which will face Knabe Road, will have a minimum 47-foot setback, and 35 percent of the property will be heavily landscaped, especially in front of the building.

Five Temescal Valley residents attended the hearing with a list of recommendations that included using earth-toned colors on the building and placing a traffic signal at Bedford Motorway. The county rejected the recommendations as unnecessary.

What’s next for Alberhill?

The orange line depicts the path of the Valley-IvyGlen transmission lines. The lines will run above ground and cross the freeway north of Glen Eden, continue north to about Indian Truck Trail where they will be placed underground. The proposed 34-acre Alberhill substation is pictured on the right.

Here’s what next for SCE’s Alberhill substation project

(Published Dec. 14, 2018)
In its quest to prove to the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), the need for another substation in the area, Southern California Edison last month asked for public comments suggesting alternatives to the Alberhill substation it plans to build in Temescal Valley. A Nov. 30 deadline was set for receipt of comments.

The We Are Temescal Valley Development Committee has taken a stand against the 34-acre Alberhill substation and its two 500-kV transmission lines and towers being located here. The committee urged residents to suggest an alternative location in the vicinity of Walker Canyon Road and Hill Top Drive, north of the I-15 in an unincorporated county area. The committee also recommended the use of battery storage technology.

Many residents complied with the request and sent comments to Edison. So, what are the next steps?

  • January-February 2019: Public invited to participate in an online “webinar.”
  • March-June 2019: SCE will present its assessment of new alternatives at an open house.
  • June-September 2019: Another public webinar planned. SCE will present its final data items submitted to the CPUC.
  • Fourth quarter 2019: The public can participate in any California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), process led by the CPUC.

Alberhill alternative comments to Edison are due Nov. 30

(Published Nov. 21, 2018)
The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) has sent Southern California Edison back to the drawing board in the utility’s quest to get approval for its proposed Alberhill substation.

At the Aug. 23 CPUC meeting, SCE’s 115-kV Valley-IvyGlen subtransmission lines were approved, but no decision was rendered on the Alberhill substation proposal. Both projects are in Temescal Valley.

Commissioners left the Alberhill project open, instructing SCE to provide new evidence indicating a need for the substation based on more reliable projections of electrical demand.

SCE held two workshops earlier this month to update ratepayers in the affected communities. In the CPUC’s final decision, there are nine areas identified for additional analyses by the utility. One of the areas is a cost/benefit analysis of several alternatives and SCE is asking the public’s assistance in identifying alternatives.

At the workshops, SCE representatives said that system alternatives must enhance the reliability of the Valley South System that has no tie-in to another system for backup and provide additional capacity – both being the intent of the Alberhill project. Suggested alternatives should evaluate energy storage, distributed energy resources, demand response and smart grid solutions.

The We Are Temescal Valley Development Committee has taken a stand against the Alberhill substation and its 500-kV transmission lines and towers being located here. The committee is suggesting an alternative location in the vicinity of Walker Canyon Road and Hill Top Drive, north of the I-15 in an unincorporated county area. The committee also recommends the use of battery storage technology.

SCE has set a Friday, Nov. 30 deadline for suggested alternatives. It’s important that Temescal Valley residents respond. If you don’t want to compose an email in your own words, there’s a “cheat sheet” below. Just follow the instructions – copy and paste into an email program and send it to ASP@sce.com.

Here’s the CPUC Decision
Here’s the SCE Workshop Presentation

___________________________________________________________________________________________________

SUGGESTED PUBLIC COMMENT TO SEND TO SCE

COPY TEXT BELOW AND PASTE INTO AN EMAIL WINDOW
SUBJECT LINE: ALBERHILL SYSTEM PROJECT
DON’T FORGET TO ADD YOUR NAME AT THE BOTTOM

EMAIL TO ASP@sce.com
DEADLINE IS FRIDAY, NOV. 30

Re: New Alternatives to Alberhill System Project following public workshop

As a resident of the Temescal Valley, I support the need for a substation that would provide power resources for future development.  While the Alberhill Substation fell short of meeting the Temescal Valley needs, the following recommendations to the Alberhill System Project would be supported by many Temescal Valley residents.

The site for the formerly proposed Alberhill System Project substation should be relocated to a location at Walker Canyon Road and Hill Top Drive, north of the Interstate 15 Freeway in unincorporated Riverside County. The rationale for this location is as follows.

1.  This substation location would not negatively impact current and future residential and commercial property development and their property values.

2.  This substation location would be easily accessible by Southern California Edison during severe weather conditions.

3.  This substation location would allow for connection to the Valley-Serrano 500 kV transmission line.

4.  The design of the substation should incorporate maximum screening elements including an aesthetic building façade and landscaping to mitigate any negative aesthetic impacts to future residential, commercial and industrial development.

5.  The substation could be developed in two phases. In phase I the substation would be developed to meet peak energy needs with the installation of batteries. In phase II the substation would be fully developed per the original Alberhill Substation design to meet the needs of new residential, commercial and industrial development.

It is believed that locating the substation at Walker Canyon Road and Hill Top Drive, north of the Interstate 15 Freeway in unincorporated Riverside County would have community support. The community (residential, commercial & industrial) needs safe and reliable power resources to facilitate the future growth within the Valley South System.

It is imperative that the approval of new substation location identified above be fast-tracked and development undertaken to meet the increased power resource needs in the next five years.

Thank you, 

Temescal Valley, CA 92883
_________________________________________________________________________________________________

VALLEY-IVYGLEN 115-kV SUBTRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT: The route of the line is depicted in dark blue. It starts at the Valley substation in Menifee, runs through Perris and Lake Elsinore, and continues into Temescal Valley, ending at the IvyGlen substation on Temescal Canyon Road. The light blue outline depicts the area to be serviced by the subtransmission line.

CPUC rules on Edison projects

(Published Sept. 14, 2018)
After five postponements dating back to May, the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), on Aug. 23 approved Southern California Edison’s 115-kV Valley-IvyGlen subtransmission lines but denied the utility’s Alberhill substation proposal.

The decision followed closely the recommendation of Hallie Yacknin, CPUC administrative law judge, who after reviewing the final environmental impact report for the two projects, issued a proposed decision to approve the Valley-IvyGlen lines and to deny the Alberhill substation.

Yacknin, in the 104-page decision released in April, ruled the need for the Valley-IvyGlen lines as a backup power source outweighed the environmental impacts on noise and air quality the project will have during construction, as well as “its significant and unavoidable cumulative impacts on air quality and biological resources.”

Yacknin’s decision for the Alberhill project was based on her belief that SCE had overstated the need for the substation based on the utility’s forecast of increased electric demand in the area. Yacknin reasoned that because it was unlikely the $464 million project will be needed, “at all or in any case by 2021, we do not find overriding considerations that merit approval.” The cost of the project would have been passed onto ratepayers.

In rendering the final decision, the CPUC ordered SCE to provide new evidence indicating a need for the substation based on more reliable projections of electrical demand. The project was left open so if new evidence is presented and found acceptable by the CPUC, the substation could be built.

Edison has spent 11 years working on the two projects – both located in Temescal Valley.

Valley-IvyGlen calls for 27 miles of single-circuit 115-kV subtransmission lines to run from the Valley substation in Menifee, through Perris and Lake Elsinore, and continue into Temescal Valley, running north along De Palma Road adjacent to Horsethief Canyon Ranch and Glen Eden Sun Club.

The above-ground lines will cross to the east side of the 1-15 north of Glen Eden and continue along Temescal Canyon Road. They will be placed underground at about Indian Truck Trail, where they will continue to the IvyGlen substation on Temescal Canyon Road near Maitri Road. Temescal Valley residents opposing the project wanted all the lines underground.

The 34-acre Alberhill substation would have been constructed on 124 acres of land owned by Edison at the corner of Temescal Canyon and Concordia Ranch roads east of the 1-15 and across the freeway from the 1,900-home Horsethief Canyon Ranch neighborhood.

Edison projects slated for Aug. 23 CPUC meeting

(Published Aug. 17, 2018)
The California Public Utilities Commission could render its final decision on the 115-kV Valley-IvyGlen subtransmission lines and the Alberhill substation at a 9:30 a.m. meeting, Thursday, Aug. 23 at CPUC headquarters in San Francisco.

The Edison projects appeared on CPUC agendas for meetings to be held May 10, and 31, June 21,  July 12 and Aug. 9 but were postponed for additional review.

CPUC judge says ‘yes’ to SCE line; ‘no’ to substation

(Published April 12, 2018 and updated May 5, 2018)
Hallie Yacknin, an administrative law judge with the California Public Utilities Commission, has reviewed the final environmental impact report for two Southern California Edison projects and issued a proposed decision to approve the 115-kV Valley-IvyGlen subtransmission lines and to deny the Alberhill substation.

With the proposed decision announced, the CPUC could render a final decision at a 9:30 a.m., Thursday, May 10 meeting to be held at Fontana City Hall, 8353 Sierra Ave. General comments from the public will be allowed during the meeting. Comments also can be emailed to: Public.Advisor@cpuc.ca.gov. Reference agenda item No. 14 and Proceeding 07-01-031.

Yacknin, in the 104-page decision dated April 4, ruled the need for the Valley-IvyGlen lines as a backup power source outweighs the environmental impacts on noise and air quality the project will have during construction, as well as “its significant and unavoidable cumulative impacts on air quality and biological resources.”

Yacknin’s decision regarding the Alberhill project was based on her belief that Edison had overstated the need for the substation based on the utility’s forecast of increased electric demand in the area. Yacknin reasoned that because it was unlikely the $464 million project will be needed, “at all or in any case by 2021, we do not find overriding considerations that merit approval.”

Edison is expected to appeal the decision’s Alberhill ruling.

The decision also noted the project would have “significant and unavoidable” impacts on aesthetics during and after construction because the structure and its transmission lines would be visible from the I-15, a scenic highway corridor, “substantially degrading the natural and rural visual character, vividness, intactness, and visual unity in the area.”

Edison has spent almost 11 years working on the two projects.

Valley-IvyGlen calls for 27 miles of single-circuit 115-kV subtransmission lines to run from the Valley substation in Menifee, through Perris and Lake Elsinore, and continue into Temescal Valley, running north along De Palma Road adjacent to Horsethief Canyon Ranch and Glen Eden Sun Club.

The lines would cross to the east side of the 1-15 north of Glen Eden and continue along Temescal Canyon Road. They would be placed underground at about Indian Truck Trail, where they will continue to the IvyGlen substation on Temescal Canyon Road near Maitri Road. Temescal Valley residents opposing the project want all the lines underground.

The proposed 34-acre Alberhill substation would be constructed on 124 acres of land owned by Edison at the corner of Temescal Canyon and Concordia Ranch roads east of the 1-15 and close to the 1,900-home Horsethief Canyon Ranch neighborhood.

The project calls for two 500-kV transmission lines to join the existing 500-kV Serrano-Valley line near the Lake Mathews-Estelle Mountain Reserve in Temescal Valley.

Read the decision:
https://www.wearetv.org/blog/docs/decision.pdf

Final EIR for Edison projects released

(Updated April 12, 2017)
The final environmental impact report for the proposed Edison powerlines and susbstation projects has been released by the California Public Utilities Commission.

It now is being reviewed or will be reviewed by an appointed Administrative Law Judge who will provide his/her proposed decision on the projects.

After the proposed decision is announced, a date and place will be set for a hearing to determine the final decision by the CPUC. This hearing will be the final opportunity for the public to offer comments on the projects.

Edison has spent more than 10 years working on the Valley-IvyGlen powerlines and the proposed Alberhill substation projects.

Valley-IvyGlen calls for 27 miles of single-circuit 115-kV subtransmission lines to run from the Valley substation in Menifee through Perris and Lake Elsinore, and continue into Temescal Valley, ending at the IvyGlen substation on Temescal Canyon Road. People protesting the project want all the lines underground.

The proposed 34-acre Alberhill substation would be constructed on 124 acres of land owned by Edison at the corner of Temescal Canyon and Concordia Ranch roads east of the 1-15 and close to the 1,900-home Horsethief Canyon Ranch neighborhood. HCR residents want the substation located elsewhere.

A significant finding in the final EIR was that none of the alternatives listed in the Draft EIR are considered environmentally superior to the proposed projects.

FINAL EIR: http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/environment/info/ene/alberhill/Alberhill.html
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

(Updated July 17, 2016)
Thank you to everyone who signed petitions and sent emails to the California Public Utilities Commission  regarding the draft environmental impact report for the Valley-IvyGlen subtransmission line  and the Alberhill substation.

Comments on the Draft EIR will be addressed in a Response to Comments document that, together with the Draft EIR, will constitute the Final EIR. The Final EIR will likely be completed by late September or early October. The CPUC will issue separate proposed decisions on SCE’s applications for the proposed Valley–Ivyglen Project and the proposed Alberhill Project.

(Updated July 10, 2016)
Send your email now to: VIG.ASP@ene.com

Deadline is Friday, July 15

(Suggested wording — include your name and address)

In regards to the Valley-IvyGlen 115-kV transmission line, I SUPPORT VIG Alternative M to underground the line along the entire proposed project alignment.

In regards to the location of a substation in Temescal Valley, I OPPOSE both the Serrano and Alberhill locations. Additional research must be undertaken to find a location suitable to the majority of Temescal Valley residents, land owners and businesses.

The orange line depicts the path of the Valley-IvyGlen transmission lines. The lines will run above ground and cross the freeway north of Glen Eden, continue north to about Indian Truck Trail where they will be placed underground. The proposed 34-acre Alberhill substation is pictured on the right.

The orange line depicts the path of the Valley-IvyGlen transmission lines. The lines will run above ground and cross the freeway north of Glen Eden, continue north to about Indian Truck Trail where they will be placed underground. The proposed 34-acre Alberhill substation is pictured on the right.

Public Utilities Commission extends deadline to July 15

(Updated May 31, 2016)
The California Public Utilities Commission has extended the deadline for the public comments period to July 15. Comments on the draft environmental impact report for Southern California Edison’s Valley-IvyGlen project and the proposed Alberhill substation can be emailed to:  VIG.ASP@ene.com 

Related Press-Enterprise report:
More time granted for power project comments

Draft EIR sets forth alternatives for the project

(Updated May, 11, 2016)
Alternative proposals in the draft environmental impact report were included based on public concerns during the scoping period last year. The CPUC then analyzed the alternatives to determine if they reduced at least one environmental impact of the proposed project.

For a better understanding of the alternatives, view the Draft Environmental Impact Report at:  http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/Environment/info/ene/ivyglen/ IvyglenDraftEIR.html

Click on 3.0 Description of Alternatives and 5.0 Comparison of Alternatives

Viable alternatives to the Valley-IvyGlen (VIG), transmission line include VIG Alternative M that would require the entire proposed project line to be undergrounded.

VIG alternative AVIG Alternative A would alleviate the necessity for the line to cross the I-15 by extending it north from Glen Eden for another 2,000 feet. The line would be undergrounded at the south end of the Vons Shopping Center, continue down Campbell Ranch Road to Temescal Canyon Road to the IvyGlen substation. Two other alternatives – B1 and B2, running above and below ground through Sycamore Creek along Santiago Canyon Road to Maitri Road, do not reduce the proposed project’s impacts.

VIG alternative CInstead of crossing to the west side of the I-15 from the proposed Alberhill substation, VIG Alternative C would keep the line on the east side of the freeway running underground along Temescal Canyon Road to Horsethief Canyon Road, turning west under the I-15 and rising above ground at De Palma Road.

SUBSTATION ALTERNATIVES

There are two alternatives for the proposed Alberhill substation. ASP Alternative B would add all gas-insulated switchgear at the substation reducing several environmental impacts.

ASP alternative DDASP Alternative DD relocates the substation to property within the Serrano Specific Plan. Approved by the county in 2010, the 489-acre Serrano Commerce Center is zoned for light industrial, commercial retail and open space. The property is on the east side of the I-15 and stretches from Temescal Canyon Road on the north to Temescal Canyon Road on the south adjacent to the freeway underpass. Development of the property never began and was further waylaid by the recession.

ASP Alternative DD would place the substation in the northern portion of the property adjacent to the former Rincor pipe plant.

The CPUC determined this alternative is aesthetically superior to the Alberhill proposal because it is not visible from the 1-15. It will be visible to Dawson Canyon, Spanish Hills and future Terramor residents. The CPUC notes that the substation’s location next to the Temescal Wash could be detrimental to this alternative, but views Serrano as being less impactful overall than Alberhill.

Unknown are the impacts the substation would have on requirements of the Serrano Specific Plan which call for hiking trails, a Temescal Valley Town Center in the plan’s commercial retail-zoned acreage and a secondary road to redirect truck traffic from the west side to the east side of the freeway.

SCE plans substation, power lines here

(Updated May 3, 2016)
The California Public Utilities Commission is now receiving comments on the final draft environmental impact report for Southern California Edison’s Valley-IvyGlen project and the proposed Alberhill substation.

The projects and their impacts will be explained at a meeting to be held in Lake Elsinore from 6 to 8 p.m., Wednesday, May 11 at the city’s Cultural Arts Center, 183 N. Main St. People attending the meeting will be able to comment on the projects.

VIEW THE DRAFT EIR

A simulated view of the transmission lines looking north on Lake Street near Temescal Canyon Road.

A simulated view of the transmission lines looking north on Lake Street near Temescal Canyon Road.

Deadline for all comments is May 31.

Comments can be emailed to: VIG.ASP@ene.com 

Or mailed to:
California Public Utilities Commission
RE: VIG/ASP
c/o Ecology and Environment, Inc.
505 Sansome Street, Suite 300
San Francisco, CA 94111

Fax: (415) 398-5326

The Valley-IvyGlen project, which Edison began nine years ago, will span 27 miles and bring a backup power source to Temescal Valley – currently only one line serves local consumers. The project calls for above-ground, single-circuit 115-kV subtransmission lines to run from the Valley substation in Menifee through Perris and Lake Elsinore, and continue into Temescal Valley, running north along De Palma Road adjacent to Horsethief Canyon Ranch and Glen Eden Sun Club.

Current view from the northbound 1-15 looking toward Concordia Ranch Road.

Current view from the northbound 1-15 looking toward Concordia Ranch Road.

The lines will cross to the east side of the 1-15 north of Glen Eden and continue along Temescal Canyon Road. They will be placed underground at about Indian Truck Trail, where they will continue to the IvyGlen substation on Temescal Canyon Road near Maitri Road.

The current 30- to 80-foot tall wooden poles will be replaced with 115-foot steel poles, plus  additional steel poles will be added to the landscape.

Simulated view after construction of the Alberhill substation.

Simulated view after construction of the Alberhill substation.

The proposed 34-acre Alberhill substation will be constructed on 124 acres of land owned by Edison at the corner of Temescal Canyon and Concordia Ranch roads east of the 1-15.

The project calls for two 500-kV transmission lines to join the existing 500-kV Serrano-Valley transmission line near the Lake Mathews-Estelle Mountain Reserve in Temescal Valley.

Last May the CPUC held a scoping meeting to answer questions about the two projects and invite public comments for the draft EIR. There were a couple dozen people in attendance – 10 from Temescal Valley, the rest Lake Elsinore residents, and they voiced concerns about the projects’ significant impacts which had been noted by the CPUC. Most all said they wanted underground lines.

The draft EIR also includes possible alternatives to what is being proposed. The alternatives, in part, came from public comments the CPUC received last year during the scoping period. One alternative to the Valley-IvyGlen lines is VIG Alternative M that calls for the entire subtransmission line to be installed underground.
VIEW OTHER ALTERNATIVES  HERE

Here are the significant impacts addressed in the draft EIR:

Significant Effects of the Alberhill Project

Resource Area Potential Effects
Aesthetics A permanent effect on aesthetics along Interstate 15 (I-15), an eligible State Scenic Highway, could result from operation of the proposed Alberhill Project because the proposed Alberhill Substation, new 500-kV transmission lines, and new and upgraded 115-kV subtransmission lines (115-kV Segments ASP1, ASP3, ASP4, and ASP5) would be visible to motorists. Permanent effects may result because of visual contrast, alterations to existing scenic integrity, blocked or partially blocked views, and the introduction of industrial-like facilities to a relatively undeveloped rural area. The following components, among others, would be viewable from I-15:

  • Two 37-foot-tall transformers
  • 49-foot-tall steel-enclosed 500-kV gas-insulated switchrack
  • Control building (7,000 square feet)
  • Parking area (7,600 square feet) and driveways (156,000 square feet)
  • 8-foot-tall concrete or decorative-block substation perimeter wall
  • 500-kV transmission lines and lattice steel towers (95 to 190 feet tall)
  • 115-kV subtransmission lines (upgraded from 65–90 feet tall to 70–100 feet tall)
Permanent effects on the visual character or quality of a site or its surrounding area could result from operation of the proposed Alberhill Project at the proposed Alberhill Substation site, along the 500-kV transmission line routes, along 115-kV Segments ASP1 and ASP6, and along the northern section of the proposed 115-kV Segment ASP2 route near the proposed Alberhill Substation site that may reduce the intactness, unity, or vividness of existing views.
Air Quality Temporary violations of maximum daily on-site emission levels of fugitive dust (particulate matter of 10 micrometers or less [PM10] and 2.5 micrometers or less [PM2.5]) would occur during construction of the proposed Alberhill Substation due to grading, excavation, and asphalting. Temporary violations for maximum daily on-site emission levels of PM10 would occur during construction of the proposed 115-kV subtransmission lines from roadwork, site preparation, structure installation, and wire stringing.
The temporary exposure of sensitive receptors to substantial concentrations of volatile organic compounds (VOC) and fugitive dust (PM10 and PM2.5) would occur during construction of the proposed Alberhill Substation, 500-kV transmission lines, and 115-kV subtransmission lines.
Biological Resources Temporary, permanent, direct, and indirect effects on Stephens’ kangaroo rat would likely result from the construction and operation of the proposed Alberhill Substation, 500-kV lines, and several of the 115-kV segments.
Temporary, permanent, direct, and indirect effects on riparian areas and federally protected wetlands (e.g., Temescal Wash or its tributaries) as defined by Clean Water Act Section 404 could result from construction and operation activities along the proposed 500-kV and 115-kV routes and at proposed Alberhill Substation site.
Hazards and Hazardous Materials Each of the 560-MVA 500/115-kV transformers would contain approximately 33,550 gallons of transformer oil. In California, all used oil is managed as hazardous waste until tested to show it is not hazardous (Section 25250.4 of the California Health and Safety Code). Direct and indirect effects from the accidental release of hazardous materials could result during construction and operation of the proposed Alberhill Substation.
Temporary and permanent effects from fire could result from construction and operation of the proposed Alberhill Project along the proposed 500-kV and 115-kV lines and at the proposed Alberhill Substation site, which would be located within or adjacent to Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones.
Hydrology and Water Quality Temporary, direct, and indirect effects on water quality and existing drainage patterns could result from construction of the proposed Alberhill Substation, access road to 500-kV Tower SA-5, and along sections of the proposed 115-kV segments due to project-related activities such as the placement of fill, earth moving activities, and the potential for spill of hazardous materials near jurisdictional (e.g., Temescal Wash ) and potentially jurisdictional waterways/drainages.
Cumulative Effects Aesthetics. A permanent effect on aesthetics along an eligible State Scenic Highway (I-15) could result from operation of the proposed Alberhill Project in addition to the proposed Talega–Escondido/Valley–Serrano (TE/VS) Project, and proposed Valley–Ivyglen Project. The proposed Alberhill Substation, 500-kV transmission lines, and 115-kV Segments ASP1 through ASP5, as well as the proposed Valley–Ivyglen Project 115-kV Segments VIG3 through VIG7 and proposed TE/VS switchyard and associated 500-kV transmission lines, would be visible from I-15.
Air Quality. A temporary violation of maximum daily on-site emission levels of PM10 and PM2.5 (fugitive dust) would occur during the construction of the proposed Alberhill System Project, proposed Valley–Ivyglen Project, and proposed TE/VS Project. Construction activities that overlap (e.g., earth-moving activities) may result in cumulative effects on air quality.
Air Quality. Construction of the proposed Alberhill System Project, proposed Valley–Ivyglen Project, and proposed TE/VS Project could result in a temporary, cumulatively considerable net increase of VOC, nitrogen oxide, particulate matter of PM10, and PM2.5 due to diesel- and gasoline-fueled engine exhaust from vehicles and equipment.
Biological Resources. Construction of the proposed Alberhill System Project, proposed Valley–Ivyglen Project, and proposed TE/VS Project could result in cumulatively considerable effects on riparian areas and federally protected wetlands.

Potentially Significant Effects of the Valley–-Ivyglen Project

Resource Area Potential Effects
Aesthetics Temporary and permanent effects on aesthetic resources along Interstate 15 (I-15) and State Route 74 (SR-74), both eligible State Scenic Highways, could result from construction and operation of the proposed Valley–Ivyglen Project. Construction would occur over a 24-month period, and construction activities along 115-kV Segments VIG1 through 115-kV VIG8 would be noticeable to area residents and motorists along I-15 and SR-74. Construction activities that would temporarily affect scenic resources include:

  • Use of vehicles and equipment for excavation and grading activities, transporting and lifting, watering to control dust, transporting workers, and other construction activities;
  • Soil and vegetation removal;
  • Removal of existing power poles;
  • Temporary construction site fencing and signage;
  • Spraying of embankment slopes with an erosion control mixture, which may be vivid in color; and
  • Temporary outdoor storage of materials, stockpiling of spoils from excavation.

A permanent effect on aesthetics along I-15 and SR-74 could result from the replacement of existing wood distribution line poles (30 to 80 feet tall) with new steel poles (up to 115 feet tall) and the introduction of new steel poles. The new poles would result in permanent visual contrast, alterations to existing scenic integrity, blocked or partially blocked views, and the introduction of industrial-like facilities to a relatively undeveloped rural area. The new and upgraded 115-kV subtransmission structures along 115-kV Segments VIG1 through 115-kV VIG8 would be intermittently noticeable to area residents and motorists along I-15 and SR-74.

Air Quality Temporary violations for maximum daily on-site emission levels of PM10 would occur during construction of the proposed 115-kV subtransmission lines from roadwork, site preparation, structure installation, and wire stringing.
The temporary exposure of sensitive receptors to substantial concentrations of volatile organic compounds (VOC) and fugitive dust (particulate matter of 10 micrometers or less and particulate matter of 2.5 micrometers or less) would occur during construction of the proposed 115-kV subtransmission lines.
Biological Resources Temporary, permanent, direct, and indirect effects on Stephens’ kangaroo rat would likely result from construction of several of the proposed 115-kV segments.
Temporary, permanent, direct, and indirect effects on riparian areas and federally protected wetlands (e.g., Temescal Wash or its tributaries or the San Jacinto River) as defined by Clean Water Act Section 404 could result from construction and operation of a number of the proposed 115-kV segments. Among the areas likely to be affected are the proposed access roads and new structures along 115-kV Segment VIG6, trenched areas to install 115-kV Segment VIG8 underground, and the area where two tubular steel poles (4765121E and 4765120E) would be installed along 115-kV Segment VIG1 adjacent to the San Jacinto River.
Hazards and Hazardous Materials Temporary effects from the use of hazardous materials and petroleum products could result in upset or accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials and petroleum products during construction.
Temporary and permanent effects from wildfire could result during construction and operation of the proposed Valley–Ivyglen Project along proposed 115-kV segments that would be located within or adjacent to Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones.
Hydrology and Water Quality Temporary and long-term effects on water quality and existing drainage patterns could result from 1) foundation excavation for 115-kV structure installations; 2) vegetation removal and earthmoving activities at construction sites and for access roads; 3) culvert construction across aquatic features; and 4) blasting. Erosion or siltation on or off site could result from the grading and vegetation clearing along a number of the proposed 115-kV Segments including along 115-kV Segment 8 where trenching would be required to install the proposed 115-kV line underground near Temescal Wash, a jurisdictional waterway.
Land Use Potential conflict with Riverside County and City of Lake Elsinore land use policies, zoning ordinances, and requirements within specific plan areas could result (e.g., Alberhill Ridge Specific Plan in Lake Elsinore) because of the installation of new structures within 50 feet of eligible State Scenic Highways (Riverside County General Plan Policy 13.4), installation of structures along visually significant ridgelines and hilltops (Riverside County General Plan Policy 11.1(d)), or within an adopted road realignment for Lake Street (City of Lake Elsinore Vesting Tentative Tract No. 35001).
Noise Temporary effects on nearby sensitive receptors could result from construction equipment and activities, including helicopter use and blasting that would exceed local noise standards, substantially increase temporary ambient noise levels, and generate substantial ground-borne vibrations during construction.
Traffic Temporary effects on air traffic patterns could result from the use of helicopters during construction that increase safety risks.
Cumulative Effects Cumulatively considerable effects may occur on aesthetics, air quality, and biological resources

 

 

Temescal Valley Road Rally is April 8

Trilogy’s TGIS President Bill Brewster with residents Wayne and Sandi Clabough man the Trilogy stop at last year’s Road Rally.

The We Are Temescal Valley Identity Committee will again host the Road Rally event, a family-fun and educational activity, scheduled from 1 to 4 p.m., Saturday, April 8.

(PRINT THE RULES, MAP AND LOCATIONS HERE)

The rally requires participants to stop at pre-determined locations throughout the valley. Participants will be asked a question about the community or given a set of physical exercises to do at each stop. A checklist will be stamped once the task is completed. Kids will be collecting beads along the way which will become a necklace at the end of the rally. If at least six communities are visited — participants will receive a free native milkweed plant. Additional communities visited will increase chances for a larger prize.

The event begins at 1 p.m., and the maps and directions can be printed HERE. The rally ends at Deleo Regional Sports Park where checklists can be turned in and prizes will be awarded at 4 p.m.

According to Chairwoman Tracy Davis, “This event provides us with a better understanding of who we are and where we live. It’s a great way to discover all the Temescal Valley neighborhoods and to learn more about our monarch butterfly project.”

For the second year, residents, HOAs and businesses are being encouraged to plant the native milkweed throughout the valley to help save the rapidly decreasing monarch population. This “Save the Monarch” effort is being supported by the El Cerrito Branch of the Riverside County Public Library System and by the Riverside-Corona Resource Conservation District.

Native milkweed plants are being grown by 7 Oaks Nursery and should be available next month. You can learn more about the valley’s monarch butterfly project HERE

For more information or to help with the rally, email Tracy: tracycyto@yahoo.com. This is a good opportunity for teens to log community service hours.

GOCO previews big plans for Glen Ivy Hot Springs

GOCO RETREAT TEMESCAL VALLEY: GOCO Hospitality, an international company specializing in the wellness hospitality business, purchased Glen Ivy Hot Springs in January 2016.

(Published July 12, 2018)
It was a standing-room-only crowd that attended the June Municipal Advisory Council meeting to learn what GOCO Hospitality has planned for Glen Ivy Hot Springs.

The 158-year-old spa and adjacent property was purchased in January 2016 by GOCO, an international wellness hospitality development and management company headquartered in Bangkok.

The current resort covers about 20 acres and GOCO seeks to develop the remaining 62.5 acres which include open land and groves, and the conference and retreat center used by Glen Ivy’s former owner, the spiritual group Emissaries of Divine Light.

Joel Morse of T&B Planning, a Tustin-based consulting firm specializing in land use planning, told the audience plans for the 

property were still in the early stages and not all questions could be answered. He asked that questions be withheld until after his presentation.

Morse said, “GOCO’s goal is to make Glen Ivy a world-class retreat and wellness center.” To that end, GOCO asked current Glen Ivy guests what they would like added to the facility. Popular answers included an outdoor bar and lounge concept, evening activities, a café with coffee shop, additional pools and water facilities, plus workshops, seminars and demonstrations.

Since purchasing the spa, GOCO has made $2.5 million in improvements, including remodels of the restaurant, bar and personal services areas, changes to the menu which now includes many home-grown vegetables, and offers evening access during the summer months.

Future plans include the Glen Ivy Hot Springs Resort Hotel with 120-140 rooms for short-term stays, and an all-day dining restaurant. The hotel also will have a library and meeting spaces, a pool with lounging areas and a kids’ learning center.

Also planned is a Community Retail Village, with shops geared to lifestyle- and wellness-related retail, coffee shop and deli, organic food store, art gallery, workshop spaces for classes and events, and a central courtyard for community events, weekend markets and exhibitions.

GOCO Retreat Temescal Valley is being designed for guests interested in a more intense wellness experience and a longer stay. The GOCO Wellness Retreat will feature 30 to 40 rooms, with doctors and specialists available for consultations, treatment rooms, a wellness restaurant with personalized food menus, tea lounge and juice bar, and areas designated for indoor and outdoor activities.

GOCO plans to build and manage 60 attached residences in three- to four-story buildings, ranging in size from 650 to 1,600 square feet. The units will be available for lease, sale or lease back and will be fully furnished.

Also planned are 180 detached, single-family homes ranging in size from 2,000 to 5,000 square feet that target individual ownership by people who appreciate the wellness concept and long-stay residents.

Outdoor activities, in addition to the current pools and mineral baths, will include yoga and exercise areas, hiking, biking and walking trails, a lazy river for rafting, organic gardening, Japanese onsen (bath) and gardens, and community parks including an Oak Tree Preservation Park. The “Temescal Experience in Temescal Valley” will feature sweat lodges (saunas) and mineral baths, recreating what attracted Native Americans to the area centuries ago.

APPLICATION SUBMITTED IN MARCH

Morse told the audience that the specific plan application for the project was submitted to the county in March, but conceptual designs were still being worked on and that a GOCO design team from Bangkok will be here refining the plan over the next two months. “We have 80 percent assuredness that what we want to do can be done,” Morse said.

After the specific plan is submitted for county review, a scoping meeting will be held to solicit public comment on the plan. At that point, the environmental impact report (EIR), process will begin, and all substantive public comments will be addressed.

Once the draft EIR is completed, public comments again will be solicited and reviewed by county planners in preparation for a public hearing before the county Planning Commission. Commissioners will vote to recommend either approval or denial of the project to the Board of Supervisors.

The final hearing, again allowing public comments, will be before the Board of Supervisors which will vote to approve or deny the project.

Morse said the process before the county is lengthy but GOCO will keep the community updated as each step unfolds.

TRAFFIC IS MAJOR CONCERN

The primary concern voiced by those in attendance was the traffic impact the expansion would have on Temescal Canyon Road and Trilogy Parkway. Morse said the traffic impact analysis would be addressed in the EIR. He was open to the suggestion that GOCO obtain property in another area of Temescal Valley that would serve as a parking lot for employees who would be bused to and from the retreat. Glen Ivy currently has about 300 employees and receives 190,000 visitors each year.

Trilogy residents balked at an easement GOCO would need for a gated road connection to Trilogy’s Gleneagles Drive cul-de-sac that would serve as a secondary exit from the retreat in case of an emergency. Morse said he had reviewed the situation and learned that Shea Homes had granted the easement to Glen Ivy Hot Springs prior to Trilogy being built.

VIEWS, OAK TREES ALSO QUESTIONED

Other concerns by Trilogy residents included the viewscape from homes located on the seventh hole of the golf course. They questioned the location of solar panels, the location of homes in the retreat’s residential area, and how many trees would be removed from the stand of oaks that borders Trilogy.

Morse said he couldn’t answer all the questions because the conceptual designs were not yet completed but they planned to remove as few oak trees as possible and, currently, only eight homes were planned in that area and it would be a side view of the residences. He said the plan was to buffer the retreat’s northern boundary with Trilogy.

One woman had issues with the lights in the parking lot, calling them “blinding,” and asked if something could be done about the situation and if the parking lot was to be expanded, could different lighting be used.

Morse told her and others in the audience, “That’s why we’re meeting with you this early in the process. We want to work with you to address concerns and issues now while we’re still in the planning stages.”

Also attending the meeting was Ingo Schweder, CEO and founder of GOCO, his wife, Josephine Leung, responsible for design and development, and Clive McNish, general manager of Glen Ivy Hot Springs.

GOCO has world-class plans for Glen Ivy Hot Springs

(Published March 8, 2017)
Action taken by the county’s Board of Supervisors at the March 7, 2017 meeting could allow Glen Ivy Hot Springs to become a “world-class” retreat and wellness center.

The 157-year-old spa and adjacent property was purchased in January 2016 by GOCO Hospitality, an international wellness hospitality development and management company headquartered in Bangkok.

The current resort covers about 20 acres and GOCO seeks to develop the remaining 62.5 acres which include open land and groves, and the conference and retreat center used by Glen Ivy’s former owner, the spiritual group Emissaries of Divine Light.

The general plan foundation and land-use changes approved by the supervisors would allow the creation of a specific plan to guide the development of the project. The approval of the amendment allows the planning to begin, but does not give approval to the project.

The new development has been named GOCO Retreat Temescal Valley with plans for a retreat accommodation with 85 rooms and 10 pool villas. Other amenities include hotel, full-service wellness center, gymnasium, yoga academy, organic farm and gardens plus a farmer’s market, outdoor recreation areas and hiking trails, banquet and meeting rooms, a retail component, kids club and an education center for holistic medicine. Glen Ivy currently has about 150 employees and receives 170,000 visitors each year. It’s anticipated the Retreat will employ an additional 150 people.

The plans also include about 90 residential units – two- and three-bedroom homes and one- to three-bedroom condominiums. GOGO founder and CEO Ingo Schweder said the retreat industry has noted increasing support of wellness communities that combine accommodations with residential offerings.

While the land-use changes were approved, when completed the specific plan must still be reviewed by the county Planning Commission and then approved by the Board of Supervisors. Both meetings would involve public hearings, giving people the opportunity to comment either for against the project.

Schweder said GOCO currently is engaged in the first phase of the plan – repairing and upgrading Glen Ivy spa.  With the general plan amendment approval, he said master planning now can begin and GOCO hopes to have the project approved this fall with construction starting in 2018 and completion by the end of 2019. Learn more about GOCO at www.gocohospitality.com/

See proceedings from the March 7, 2017 Board of Supervisors meeting  HERE